5 things Linux needs to do to become more popular

tuxThe launch of Windows 10 has prompted many articles promoting the benefits of Linux. If you are changing your OS anyway, they say, why not take the opportunity to switch to Linux? Fat chance.

The Linux community has been trying to get people to switch to Linux for, well, forever. As a desktop operating system Linux has failed to convince people that it has anything to offer them. Ten years ago the market share of Linux was around 1% and today it isn’t much different.

It is true that Linux powers a lot of stuff you don’t see and that Android, of which there are a billion phones and tablets, is a type of Linux, but I am focusing on desktop usage here. PCs in homes and offices.

There, Linux has failed to stimulate any interest at all. If you are giving away something for free and no-one takes it, it must tell you that there is something seriously wrong with the product. So what is wrong with Linux?

Here are five ideas to make Linux better and to turn it into something that people might actually want.

1 Fewer distros – 10 max

There are far too many versions of Linux and this is confusing for people. I am not talking about Linux experts, but the general public. There are said to be over 400 different versions of Linux and only three days ago EFYTimes published a list of 240 with links to each distro’s website.

There are probably double this when you consider that there are often 32-bit and 64-bit versions, and versions with different desktops. There are 14 versions of the current release of Linux Mint for example. That is 14 versions of one distro.

It is mind boggling and having a choice of distros does not help to sell Linux to the general public. Microsoft has sometimes been criticised for offering 10 or more versions of Windows and Linux has an extra 390. When there is too much choice, people are numbed into inaction. They cannot decide.

Top 40 Linux distros

The top 40 from distrowatch.org. Some come in multiple versions

Firstly, there is the fear of choosing the wrong one and you could end up with one that does not do what you want or support the software you need.

There is also the very real problem of actually choosing the wrong one and having a bad experience with it because it does not do what you want, is difficult to install, has little software and is just for technical geeks.

There is an old saying, “United we stand, divided we fall,” and Linux is a divided community with hundreds of distros all pulling in different directions instead of all pulling together. They are all trying to gain users, all claiming they are the Linux you need and that their Linux is the best Linux.

Creating so many different versions of Linux is a waste of time and effort.

Just imagine the thousands of programmers that must be involved in creating hundreds of Linux distros, all slightly different. Let us suppose there are, on average, 5 people involved with every distro (some distros are one-man bands, but hundreds of people work on Ubuntu).

That makes over 2,000 programmers working on Linux. Not as a team working towards a common goal, but all working on private projects that are incompatible with each other.

Just think what could be achieved if all those programmers worked together on one project. In order for Linux to gain popularity with the general public as a desktop operating system, there should be a maximum of 10 distros. Those other 390 have to go. They are holding back acceptance by the general public.

2 One software store for everyone

Some Linux distros have a nice software center that provides an easy way to find and install software. The problem is that each distro has its own collection of software. Some don’t even have a simple software center and instead, they rely on applications like Synaptic Package Manager or even the command line.

There should be one store containing a list of Linux software and a simple Install button. Software should also come with a simple uninstaller too.

 Ubuntu Software Centre

Outside of a distro’s software center, Synaptic Package Manager or whatever they use, it gets really confusing for the public. Different distros require different file formats and even when distros share the same file format, the software can be compatible with one Linux but not another.

The software situation is a mess and confuses the public. It puts people off Linux. Software can confuse Windows users with XP, Vista, 7 and 8, each in 32-bit and 64-bit versions, and it can be hard work out if software will run. The number of Linux distros is an order of magnitude greater and so are the problems.

Will software for Debian run on Fedora? How about software for OpenSUSE on Ubuntu? That’s four Linux distros. Imagine the problems facing people who have a choice of 400 distros.

3 Get rid of the Terminal

Linux experts love the Terminal because with the right commands you can do anything. Although there is a command prompt in Windows and Mac users have a Terminal, the majority of Windows PC and Apple Mac users do not know what it is and have never used it.

Getting rid of the Terminal would force Linux developers to think of other ways of doing things using the graphical interface. You can do almost everything on a Windows PC or Apple Mac by pointing and clicking on menus, buttons, and other controls. Why not Linux?

 Linux Terminal

People can often work out the solution to problems if there are buttons, menus and controls to click on, but they cannot work out the command and syntax of something you must type into the Terminal.

Too often the solution to a Linux problem is some expert saying something like “Type the following at the command prompt: echo -e '\E[7m'”. How is anyone supposed to work that out?

Try and live for a month without using the Terminal in Linux. Most Windows and Mac users go a year without touching it. If there is something you need to do and you cannot do it by pointing and clicking with the mouse, then that’s a fail.

4 Better software

People don’t care about operating systems, they care about software. The Apple Mac is a brilliant computer with a great operating system, but even Mac users run Windows. The reason is that there is an application that only runs on Windows and they must have it.

Photoshop does not run on Linux and if you need to use Photoshop then your choice of operating system is between Windows or OS X. Linux is not an option. A single program can end up being a barrier preventing Linux being used.

There are Linux alternatives to many market leading Windows and Mac software packages, but mostly they are not the same and they are not as good. Sorry, but GIMP is not Photoshop and LibreOffice is not Microsoft Office. It is true that they are free alternatives and good in their own way, but only in the same way that a Ford is an alternative to a Ferrari, and a Toyota Prius is an alternative to a Tesla.

Instead of spending time and effort making the operating system better, which will have little effect on usage, developers should focus on creating killer software. People use Windows because it has program X, whatever X may be (Office, Photoshop, InDesign, and so on). What is Linux’s killer application?

5 What can Linux do to become more popular?

In addition to reducing the number of Linux distros, setting up a single online store and file format, and creating a killer app, there are other ways to increase its popularity.

The world is changing and we are doing more online than ever before. In fact, you can almost do everything online and computers like Chromebooks are basically internet computers that do little offline. If Google can sell Chromebooks then surely there is a market for Linux.

There are online office suites like Microsoft Office web apps, and Google Drive with Docs, Sheets and Slides, there are online photo editors and video editors, and the services that people use most, like Facebook, Twitter, and other social networks, are online anyway.

In some ways the operating system is becoming less relevant as everything moves online. If you spend all your time in a browser, what does it matter which OS it is running on? Word processing, email, social media, accounts, photo storage and albums, and so on, all run online in a browser window.

When the OS is no longer relevant, Linux might gain popularity, but it needs marketing.

It is interesting to compare the home pages of Linux distros with the home pages of Windows and OS X. Microsoft and Apple tell you about all the wonderful things that Windows and OS X can do for you and how they will transform your life, how you can work and play, watch films and TV shows, listen to music, and browse the web. There are pictures of kids and families, young people doing fun stuff with smiles on their faces, and so on.

Linux home pages are full of technical jargon. Not one of them explains what the Linux distro will do for you or how it enables you to do stuff. They don’t put people on their pages doing fun things, implying that maybe Linux isn’t fun. Linux websites are technical pages written by geeks for geeks, not the public.

Linux needs a marketing makeover. Look at how Microsoft sells Windows and how Apple sells OS X. Of course, the one-man-distro maker doesn’t have the budget to advertise like Microsoft and Apple, but they could at least make the websites user friendly.

Linux should show people doing fun things on their computer and websites need a serious makeover to convince the public to use it.


notepad Save 50% on RAWinfopages online courses! Get 50 Shares A Day - PDF with 50 places to promote your blog/website daily!
Join our FREE newsletter!

 


 

2 Comments on 5 things Linux needs to do to become more popular

  1. No. Just no. This article is full of so much crap it’s attracting flies.
    For starters, a lot of distro websites show features without filling them with technical jargon. Go to Ubuntu’s website and see for yourself. There is an entire section about features and ease of use.

    Second, getting rid of the terminal to “force” developers to water the OS down is ludicrous. While it is true that a lot of people don’t use the Windows command line on a regular basis, those with advanced computer skills do. The average user who simply wants to play games and browse the internet would find that they don’t need the command line in Linux any more than they do in Windows. I only use it to fix advanced problems.

    Third, to suggest that free programs like GIMP and Open Office are not as good as their commercial counterparts is absurd. I can do EVERYTHING I can do with Photoshop and MS-Office, and without the $600+ price tags.

    Lastly, you seem to be implying that people are too stupid to deal with multiple choices, and that when presented with too many free products, they drop to the intellectual levels of complacent farm animals and refuse to stray from the comfortable and familiar. That’s bold, I must say.

    Here’s the real reason Linux doesn’t have a particularly large market share: Microsoft has a larger advertising budget. They can pay to promote their newest flavor of trash because they’ve got deals with most computer manufacturers. Windows is provided at discounted rates for the new computers, and in exchange everyone who buys a new computer off the shelf gets a new copy of Windows and Microsoft gets money. That’s why they can promote Winblows until the end of time, run smear campaigns against free *nix operating systems, and convince everyone that Linux will make life harder for them.

    Software companies develop almost exclusively on the Winblows platform because Microcrap has cornered the market, but times are changing. More and more companies are starting to develop across all platforms. Linux is on the rise. Soon you will eat your words.

    • The success of Windows and lack of enthusiasm for Linux is not just because Windows is bundled with PCs. Computer suppliers have tried selling PCs with Linux and haven’t had much success.

      People also have a choice and Apple Macs are an alternative, so no-one is forced to have Windows.

      OS X on an Apple Mac is actually very like Linux. It could be thought of as a flavour of Linux, but Apple has made it super easy to use. Try comparing a Linux PC with an Apple Mac and you’ll see how Linux should be done.

      You say ” Linux is on the rise. Soon you will eat your words.”

      I once believed the hype. Around 2009 I put Linux on my desktop PC and became a Linux user. I thought it would be the next big thing. Seven years on and what has changed? Linux still has only a 1% market share and I went back to Windows. I haven’t touched Linux at all this year.

      It’s a shame, because Linux could be great (like Mac OS X).

Comments are closed.